geforce gtx 550 ti vs ati amd radeon r7 m260

#GEFORCE GTX 550 TI VS ATI AMD RADEON R7 M260 UPGRADE#

The R7 265 was unveiled last week but retailers have yet to receive stock. Again, on paper, assuming both cards are available for $150, the R7 265 is a better buy.īut given how unreliable AMD's pricing info has been lately we wouldn't be surprised if the R7 265's $150 suggested retail price isn't met. AMD's solution consumed 32% more power than Nvidia's, though in the games we tested during that scenario the R7 265 was also 24% faster, so that point is moot. Yet we have a hard time recommending the GTX 750 Ti over the R7 265 as the Radeon offers 13% more performance (on average) and over 20% in games such as Battlefield 4. We got an extra 26% out of the GM107 core as we hit 1290MHz from 1020MHz versus a 17% boost on the Radeon R7 265. It's also worth noting that Nvidia's efficiency gains allow for compact cards with plenty of overclocking headroom. The bigger picture is that Maxwell cards with similar specifications to those based on Kepler should be significantly faster while consuming about the same amount of power.

#GEFORCE GTX 550 TI VS ATI AMD RADEON R7 M260 UPGRADE#

That's a tremendous upgrade over 2012's Kepler-based offering, while remaining at the same price point. 0.On paper we worried that the GTX 750 Ti carried 17% less CUDA cores and 38% less TAUs than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, however once the results were in we were glad to see it's actually 22% faster than the GTX 650 Ti on average while consuming roughly the same amount of power - slightly less in most cases. #50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #47 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s.

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #41 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s. #18 getting avg benchmarks for device 2378 +0s. #16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s. #15 getting avg benchmarks for device 2593 +0.028s. #9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.059s. #4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s. #3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17:27:05 +0200 +0s. 3D Printing, 5G, Accessory, AI, Alder Lake, AMD, Android, Apple, Arc, ARM, Audio, Benchmark, Biotech, Business, Camera, Cannon Lake, Cezanne (Zen 3), Charts, Chinese Tech, Chromebook, Console, Convertible / 2-in-1, Cryptocurrency, Cyberlaw, Deal, Desktop, DIY, E-Mobility, Education, Exclusive, Fail, Foldable, Gadget, Galaxy S, Gamecheck, Gaming, Geforce, Google Pixel, GPU, How To, Ice Lake, Intel, Intel Evo, Internet of Things (IoT), iOS, iPad, iPad Pro, iPhone, Jasper Lake, Lakefield, Laptop / Notebook, Launch, Leaks / Rumors, Linux / Unix, List, Lucienne (Zen 2), MacBook, Mini PC, Monitor, MSI, OnePlus, Opinion / Kommentar, Phablet, Radeon, Raptor Lake, Renoir, Review Snippet, RISC-V, Rocket Lake, Ryzen (Zen), Science, Security, Single-Board Computer (SBC), Smart Home, Smartphone, Smartwatch, Software, Storage, Tablet, ThinkPad, Thunderbolt, Tiger Lake, Touchscreen, Ultrabook, Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR), Wearable, Wi-Fi 7, Windows, Workstation, XPS, Zen 3 (Vermeer), Zen 4

Geforce gtx 550 ti vs ati amd radeon r7 m260